Hit send too early... Your benchmarks do show that something is strange hen comparing the make (memclr) and copy (memory copy) cases. Out of my element here :)
On Jun 27, 2017 7:01 PM, "Kevin Malachowski" <ke...@chowski.com> wrote: > But memclr+copy is slower than just copy, right? > > On Jun 27, 2017 6:53 PM, "T L" <tapir....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 8:55:48 PM UTC-4, Kevin Malachowski wrote: >>> >>> It's best to compare the assembly, but my guess: 'make' has to zero out >>> the memory, whereas allocation using append does not. >> >> >> allocation using append will copy each element, which should be slower >> than memclr. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to >> pic/golang-nuts/nDYYHKwvYhQ/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.