On 04/24/2017 11:02 AM, Sokolov Yura wrote: > Good day, people. > > Title is a bit controversial :-) > > I want to ask: > - how useful `recover` for you? > - Don't you think it is a bit "dangerous"? > > I mean: panic usually means programmer error,
I don"t know what you mean saying that any panic is caused by a bug: being honest, I have seen panic conditions related to weird behaviors into the underlying infrastructure, like "not really seamless" network failover, or storage failover into SAN systems. Personaly I have used it to manage the situation when the connection to a server is dropped because of any change of a failover interfaces, when raw sockets are not managed (we implemented SCTP over raw sockets in Linux), and the daemon just survives and reconnects. I cannot see any "danger" in this, until you check this doesn't ends into a loop of endless restarts, when the failure condition keeps existing. L. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
