On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 16:02:47 UTC-4, Pierre Curto wrote: > > Hello, > > My guess: > If you dont pass in a pointer, then you pass a value. > What would be the point of updating the value that you will never see and > that will get discarded? > Hence it returns a map that provides the unmarshaled values so at least > you have something to work with. > >> >> True, if I pass in a raw value wrapped in a blank interface. In this case we are talking about a field on a struct that is already addressable - which in turn makes the content of the struct field addressable - then why not just update the underlying value?
/Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
