On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Pablo de la Concepción Sanz < pconcepc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > First of all, thanks for collecting and sharing the info. I've noticed > that on some questios, some answers are mostly the same but they are > separate. For instance for "What one addition would make the biggest > improvement to Go editing in your preferred editor?" The two top ones are > "debugging" and "debugger", that to my mind should be the same. > > Is there a reason to separate those cases? > Those tables are generated programmatically according to the algorithm described in the "reading the data" section after the first such display. If you want to mentally add debugging and debugger together, sure, go ahead. But as Steve said the goal in those plots was to show the actual data, not our interpretation of the data. Our take on the data is in the main text instead. And of course, in this specific case, there are many topics related to debugging that don't have to do with debuggers. Russ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
