But is it possible to finalize a discussion about finalizers?

 

John

    John Souvestre - New Orleans LA

 

From: Michael Jones [mailto:michael.jo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2017 January 29, Sun 20:38
To: Val
Cc: golang-nuts; j...@souvestre.com
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Re: I know finalizers are not promised to be called, but 
is it too not promised?

 

"endeavor to"

"anticipate"

"allow for"

"prepare for"

"encourage"

"facilitate"

   ...good

 

"ensure" / "force" / "guarantee" (not in your control)

"reclaim" / "recycle" / "release" (too absolute)

   ...bad

 

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Val <delepl...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Jesper
if I understand this thread correctly, "make sure" should be rephrased by "make 
extra efforts for ...".

Sorry for nitpicking  (not trying to look pedantic or arrogant)
Val

On Sunday, January 29, 2017 at 4:28:09 PM UTC+1, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:

 

 you'd like to eventually make sure that you don't leak said resource
...

 the library makes sure that it handles it itself, though with added resource 
pressure as a result.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





 

-- 

Michael T. Jones
michael.jo...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to