Which functions? What are you actually changing? A wrapper library doesn't have to wrap all the functions: just wrap the ones you need to and make it a small, composable library.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:12 PM Marwan abdel moneim <mrwnm...@gmail.com> wrote: > do your changes require you to modify the package? > > yes, i want to add some functions, but still provide all the package to > the user > > Why not use wrap it? > > i would have to wrap all the functions, very tedious > > On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 5:06:31 AM UTC+2, Matt Silverlock wrote: > > No, but without more context, do your changes require you to modify the > package? Why not use wrap it? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/g9NYQNaBBMA/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
