On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Tyler Compton <xavi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While theoretically, I agree with your argument against using the short > variable declaration pattern, I've personally found that in practice it > isn't an issue. I think that if this is something you run into often, it > might suggest that you're letting too many variables into your scope, > whether that means having too many generically named global variables or > being inside too large a function. > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, 11:57 AM Shawn Milochik <shawn.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Here's a good discussion about it: >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-nuts/J9QeizedpuI/ECifbR0YGcsJ >> >> TL;DR: scope >> >> I'm not making an argument against them, and use them all the time. The original post in that thread was from years ago, when I was new to Go and steeped in the ways of Python. :o) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
