https://golang.org/ref/spec#Calls
Look for "As a special case, if the return values of a function or method g are equal in number" On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:42 PM, John Souvestre <j...@souvestre.com> wrote: > Then I'm still confused. Where is this inconsistency / limitation / > non-orthogonal "syntactic sugar" defined? I'm trying to understand why it > exists if perhaps it isn't necessary. > > John > > John Souvestre - New Orleans LA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: golang-nuts@googlegroups.com [mailto:golang-nuts@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of Dave Cheney > Sent: 2017 January 25, Wed 18:30 > To: golang-nuts > Subject: RE: [go-nuts] Is Go too strict for nesting function callings? > > It was just a turn of phrase, it's not a real rule. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
