On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:37 AM Eric Brown <edb1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry guys, found the issue... and it's from my inexperience. The
> functions that is happening to are ones I used a switch condition (which I
> could've used an if condition on instead).
>
> I used:
>
> switch strings.Contains(targetDatabase.Driver, ConvertString("[!]sqlite[!]"))
> {
> case true:
> case false:
>
> instead of
>
> if strings.Contains(targetDatabase.Driver, ConvertString("[!]sqlite[!]")) {
> } else {
> }
>
>
> Of course the compiler won't always assume all possible outcomes of a
> switch to ensure it's being caught... and thus the problem. Wish I
> wouldn't have pre-emptively posted this now. My apologies...
>
Having a default: case that returns might have solved that issue as well.
>
>
> On Saturday, January 14, 2017 at 3:31:32 PM UTC-6, Eric Brown wrote:
>
> Using go, when I create a function with a return... and that function uses
> an if... else... condition w/ the return being passed under each, the
> compiler still throws an error 'missing return at end of function'? I can
> put a return at the end of the function, but it will never get to that
> point because of this condition. Is that expected, or could I be doing
> something different to prevent this outcome? Not that it matters... but I
> hate just having random returns at the bottom of functions that don't do
> anything other than satisfy this issue.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
