Syncthing's transfer model is a bit different with it's block-exchange protocol, so it's a bit difficult to compare the exact behavior. For most use cases, I think you'd see comparable performance in terms of data transfer required for change propagation, though Mutagen could perform a few additional optimizations that it doesn't currently do, e.g. optimizing rsync block size based on file size, but these would be very marginal gains.
-Jacob On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 7:13:06 PM UTC+2, wilk wrote: > > On 05-01-2017, Shawn Milochik wrote: > > --94eb2c1a09e43b9d8205455b0873 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > I really like the idea of what you have here. I'm currently using > SyncThing > > for this purpose. SyncThing seems to fit all your requirements with the > > exception of only needing to be installed on one of the machines. > However, > > in return SyncThing allows you to select which folders are shared from > each > > machine to each other machine, making it really useful for sharing only > a > > subset of your data with other people. https://syncthing.net/ > > The bonus of syncthing is also deduplication on whole files right ? > Mutagen will do it also ? > > > > -- > William > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
