Good points! I'll keep this in mind! Thanks again
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 at 11:32, Damian Gryski <dgry...@gmail.com> wrote: > This ends up being only half a megabyte of memory (65536 x 8 byte > pointers) for the array-based solution. > > > > You can always write your own hash table, or convert your uint16 key to a > uint32 for lookup purposes. (I've done the same thing with floats to speed > up a float64-keyed hash table.) > > > > Damian > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. > > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/1iSmPQ6vrl0/unsubscribe. > > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
