I see, well that makes the compiler error make more sense. You're trying to
declare a function type within a function. Use a function literal instead,
for example: `doIT := func(p Params) string { ... }`.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Betsy Lichtenberg <bet...@nestlabs.com>
wrote:
> The expression is inside of the main function.
>
> package main
>
> import (
> "fmt"
> "strings"
> "net/http"
> "io/ioutil"
> )
>
> func main() {
>
> url := "https://developer-api.nest.com/structures";
>
> payload := strings.NewReader("code=aaaaa&client_id=bbbb&client_secret=
> cccc&grant_type=authorization_code")
>
> req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", url, payload)
>
> req.Header.Add("content-type", "application/json")
>
> type Params struct {
> auth string
> }
>
> func doIt(p Params) string {
> return p.auth
> }
>
> doIt(Params{auth: xxxx})
>
> res, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
>
> defer res.Body.Close()
> body, _ := ioutil.ReadAll(res.Body)
>
> fmt.Println(res)
> fmt.Println(string(body))
>
> }
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Chris Manghane <cm...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> That error seems to be from writing that expression outside of a
>> function. There's no problem with structs supporting string fields:
>> https://play.golang.org/p/YeP2qhRdxp.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Betsy Lichtenberg <bet...@nestlabs.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Do structs support strings? I tried this:
>>>
>>> type Params struct {
>>> auth string
>>> }
>>>
>>> func doIt(p Params) string {
>>> return p.auth
>>> }
>>>
>>> doIt(Params{auth: xxxx})
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm getting these errors:
>>>
>>> betsyl-macbookpro:~ betsyl$ go run get1.go
>>>
>>> # command-line-arguments
>>>
>>> ./get1.go:25: syntax error: unexpected doIt, expecting (
>>>
>>> ./get1.go:29: syntax error: unexpected literal .2, expecting comma or }
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Val <delepl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Betsy
>>>> There is no "passing optional arguments by name" in go.
>>>>
>>>> This link [1] has an overview what what can or can't be done for
>>>> optional params :
>>>> - the *Functional options* technique.
>>>> - or you may define a struct as parameter, then call it with only the
>>>> fields you're interested in : [2]
>>>> This implies that "the zero values must be meaningful (i.e. acceptable
>>>> in your context : nil, 0, etc.)"
>>>>
>>>> things := Things{amount: 13}
>>>> show(things)
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2032149/optional-parameters
>>>> [2] https://play.golang.org/p/yiKzomwTKM
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 6:46:23 AM UTC+1, bet...@google.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In Python, I can include params like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> =====================
>>>>>
>>>>> *params = {'auth': 'XXXXXXXX'}*
>>>>>
>>>>> response = requests.request("GET", url, data=payload, headers=headers,
>>>>> *params=params*)
>>>>>
>>>>> =====================
>>>>>
>>>>> Any pointers on how Golang does this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Betsy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "golang-nuts" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
