+golang-nuts bcc golang-dev On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:26 PM <mcsoft2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you don't like the framework just don't use it. > I'm using this framework in production for a long time and the author > makes his best to solve any incoming issue. > > He, literally, gave his personal time and money to see that project > growning up. > > You seem a low person, mentally, who calls another person, who is unknown > to you, a 'thief' and that's a crime by your side, the whole post contains > moral characterizations and I am wondering why the forum moderators let > your post to be published. > > Τη Πέμπτη, 27 Οκτωβρίου 2016 - 2:35:43 μ.μ. UTC+3, ο χρήστης Aram > Hăvărneanu έγραψε: > > I have received a very insulting and distressing e-mail from Sarah > Adams, who claims to represent the The Go Code of Conduct Team, an > illicit bully organization who claims authority about what Go > contributors think and say outside the Go mailing lists. I do not > recognize this group's legitimacy in these matters. > > The e-mail says: > > We received a report about your comment on this thread > > https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_really_should_stop_using_iris/d8wdynd > : > "Their English was so bad I couldn't understand what was > going on". > > This comment goes against our community Code of Conduct, > https://golang.org/conduct. The comment is not respectful, > and would have been more productive just as, "I couldn't > understand what was going on". > > Please consider this a warning from the Code of Conduct > working group. > > Some more context is necessary. There is someone in the Go community > who literally steals other people's code, receives money for it, > and actively tries to covers his tracks. > > A person named Florin Pățan provided an overview: > > [1] > http://www.florinpatan.ro/2016/10/why-you-should-not-use-iris-for-your-go.html > > which has been discussed on reddit: > > [2] > https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57tmp1/why_you_should_not_use_iris_for_your_go_projects > . > > Reddit also discussed this thief's action in another thread: > > [3] > https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_really_should_stop_using_iris/ > > I have archived these documents here: > > [1] http://archive.is/9oN1A > [2] http://archive.is/Q36G5 > [3] http://archive.is/aSFUg > > The comment in question refers to this GitHub issue, also archived: > > [4] https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/pull/1137 > [4] http://archive.is/7xgc7 > > Now take a look at what I said, and what Sarah Adams in her > infinite arrogance suggests I should have said: > > Aram: Their English was so bad I couldn't understand what > was going on > > Sarah: I couldn't understand what was going on > > If you compare these two phrases: you can see that the problem Sarah > Adams has is with "their English was so bad". > > In other words, Sarah's problem is with speaking the objective > *TRUTH*. > > Whether someone speaks good or bad English is an objective fact > easily determined by anyone who speaks English at some level of > proficiency. I encourage all English speakers to take a look at [4] > and do an individual assessment of the level of proficiency in English > those sock puppets possess. > > I will not be policed around for telling the *TRUTH*. I will not > be silenced into political compliance. I will not tolerate other > people who tell me what is acceptable to say, especially when these > people only want to hide the *OBJECTIVE TRUTH*. > > The comment is not respectful > > Damn right it wasn't. You or your organization has no authority > mandating how respectful my speech is. What level of arrogance. > > However, it was not disrespectful. It was an objective assessment > of an *infractor's* level of English competence. > > I owe nobody respect. Certainly not someone who breaks the law and > steals other people's intellectual property. Respect is earned. > > and would have been more productive just as > > Ah, yes, here you can see in action the new-age practice of corporate > double speak applied to open source projects. This is not Google. > You are not fooling me or anyone else who still has a grain of > independent thought left. > > This is a pathetic and disgusting attempt of silencing independent > contributors who still refuse to kneel after your coup d'état in > which you managed to replace the Go technical governance with a > thought police political organization vassal to Google. > > In some sense, you have succeeded. I will never yield to you, you > can never silence me, but you certainly made me realise that my > association with the Go project is a mistake and a liability. I do > not want to be associated with your organization, even accidentally. > When I contribute to Go, I only make you people stronger. In fact, > this is your modus operandi; you rely on people who do the actual > technical work (either as part of the Go team, or as contributors) > in order to gain more support for your cause. To gain legitimacy. > To claim authority. > > I cannot remove the code I have contributed to the Go project over > the years, but I can certainly stop contributing as an individual > in the future. I will make sure, best of my ability, that any > competent individual or organization who is evaluating Go is made > aware of who is actually pulling the strings here, and what they > are getting into. > > Stalking people online for thought crimes! This is what the Go > project has succumbed to! And newcomers need to be aware of that. > > You are luring people with technical arguments and weed them with > political correctness. Your propaganda machine is strong, but not > infallible. Just like all good propaganda, you rely on a majority > of true facts to hide you agenda and falsehoods. Yes, your technical > preaching is truthful, and that is the best disguise for your dark > agenda of manipulation, control and deceit. > > But you are not fooling everyone, you are not fooling me. I will > not be controlled by a neo-puritan organization. > > If there's anyone left who still has the power and courage to say > no to these bullies, consider who you should prosecute: > > 1) a thief who makes money from stolen intellectual > property > 2) someone who realized the thief's command of the > English language is so poor, he cannot be understood. > > Thank you. > > PS: I suspect it's the thief himself who reported me to your > organization, and because your extrajudicial court works so well, > you have managed to sentence the wrong person. > > -- > Aram Hăvărneanu > Go contributor > Not a thief > Critical thinker > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
