var could do that too:
https://play.golang.org/p/v9pQSZPTh_
(not that I'm advocating in favor of var in more places)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In fact, this example hints at something important. You could do as you
> say and create variables of *different* types which I find very general
> compared to the suggested var feature:
>
> for a, b, c := 0, 0.5, big.NewFloat(0.5).SetPrec(200); a < 15; a++ {
>
> (https://play.golang.org/p/OM7OC3R949)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Ian Lance Taylor <
> i...@golang.org>
> Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM
> To: Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com>
> Cc: T L <tapir....@gmail.com>, golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Are short variable declarations necessary?
>
> You can create multiple local variables in the for scope by writing,
> for example
> for a, b := 0, 10; a < b; a++ {
> (That would work with var, too).
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
