On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 11:24:50 PM UTC+8, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote: > > The rule is that a short variable declaration requires that at least one > non-blank variable is new (the specification even says so) Consider > > _, y := 4,5 > > where one variable, y, is new. In > > _ := 6 > > or > > _, _ := 5, 7 > > this rule is violated, since there are no non-blank variables (and thus > vacuously nothing new). > > I think the reason this is a rule is because it may detect some spurious > errors by forcing the programmer to write code in a certain style, but I > may be wrong. >
What spurious errors? > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:50 PM <di...@veryhaha.com <javascript:>> wrote: > >> . >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
