On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:54:32 -0700 (PDT) David Luu <manga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Why do you care? > > I personally wouldn't but a (test framework) protocol built on top of > XML-RPC that I want to interface to expects the following response > back: > > <methodResponse> > <params> > <param> > <value><struct> > <member><name>return</name> [...] > and the only XML-RPC (server) package for go I've > found: https://github.com/divan/gorilla-xmlrpc, guess what it uses to > map that kind of XML-RPC data structure to? A go struct. That was > looking over the README, haven't delved into the code for that > package, but there might not be other alternative options w/o > modifying that package's code. A go map might have been more flexible > to workaround naming issues. [...] Can't you not use the standard way to deal with this -- using struct tags? type response struct { Return string `xml:"return"` ... } -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
