Cool. thanks!

-Jyotiswarup Raiturkar

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Axel Wagner <axel.wagner...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Yes, you are pretty much there, but you are using t, which is a variable
> of the type (so the method has an already bound receiver and is thus of
> type func()), instead you need to reference the method on *Test itself,
> which has the correct signature: https://play.golang.org/p/NKGBDse-9n
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:36 PM, 'Jyotiswarup Raiturkar' via golang-nuts <
> golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Is it possible to define a type for a method . Something like below for f
>> Arent methods basically syntactic sugar for functions?
>>
>> type Test struct  {
>> A string
>> }
>>
>> func (t *Test) P() {
>> fmt.Println(t.A)
>> }
>>
>> type AttribSetter func(t *Test)
>>
>> var f AttribSetter
>>
>> t := &Test{"meow"}
>> f = AttribSetter(t.P)
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to