Thanks Dave - all good suggestions!

> Use a GCE Network LB instead of HTTP LB.

I'm hoping to avoid using a network LB since we are operating over https so
that means we'll have to terminate SSL ourselves (which means distributing
our certs to each backend instance).  Using an http(s) LB means we only
have to upload our cert to our google cloud project and our backends only
have to speak http - very convenient.

> You say your clients can't be modified... Can't they? I've never heard of
browsers using 100-Continue unprompted, so if it is just chrome/firefox/IE,
what are you doing that's causing them to use 100-Continue? Or are they
some other client software like Mercurial?

I'm curious about this as well.  I've tried to find some info online on
*when* chrome (or other browsers) use 100-continue, but haven't found
anything useful or current.  I've also tried playing around locally and
haven't been able to get my local chrome to send that header.  Our app in
this case is a javascript snippet that sends POST XHRs with fairly large
json payloads.  I managed to correlated in our logs (via user agents) that
one of the clients that was served 502s (and thus presumably send us an
Expect header) was Chrome 52 and another was Edge.  So certainly nothing
too esoteric.

If we could somehow figure out a way to change our javascript so that we
don't trigger whatever conditions convince browsers to (sometimes?) use
this header, that would be great.


On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:08 AM David Anderson <d...@natulte.net> wrote:

> Tricky one. A couple of options spring to mind, none of them amazingly
> good:
>
>    - Use a GCE Network LB instead of HTTP LB. You can bring the TCP
>    sessions straight to your web servers, with load-balancing done
>    per-TCP-session rather than per-HTTP-request.
>    - Build your web server using a modified Go stdlib codebase that
>    removes this conditional block:
>    https://golang.org/src/net/http/server.go#L1562 . If you do this, I
>    suggest also filing a bug against Go to evaluate whether "don't do
>    automatic Continue support" should be added as a Server knob.
>    - Stick the Go web servers behind a non-Go proxy layer (e.g. nginx)
>    that strips out the "Expect: 100-continue" header before forwarding to the
>    Go server. Run one nginx per Go server, on the same machines (or in the
>    same Kubernetes pods if using GKE), so that the system properties look the
>    same from the POV of the upstream load-balancer (same number of backends,
>    same arrangement...).
>    - Wait for GCE to support 100-Continue. Given that 100-Continue is
>    almost non-existent on the web, personally I wouldn't hold my breath, I
>    suspect it's a low-priority item.
>    - You say your clients can't be modified... Can't they? I've never
>    heard of browsers using 100-Continue unprompted, so if it is just
>    chrome/firefox/IE, what are you doing that's causing them to use
>    100-Continue? Or are they some other client software like Mercurial?
>
> - Dave
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ian Rose <ianros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I'm currently running a group of Go web servers behind an HTTP(s) load
>> balancer on Google Compute Engine.  Unfortunately I have learned that GCE
>> load balancers do not support the "Expect: 100-continue" header [1].  From
>> my experiments, it appears that it isn't actually the request header that
>> causes the problem, but instead is the server's "100 Continue" response
>> that the load balancer dies on.  Specifically, the load balancer responds
>> with a 502 to the client.
>>
>> Any suggestions on how to deal with this?  We don't control our clients
>> (they are just "browsers across the internet") so solving things on that
>> side isn't possible.  After digging through the net/http code a bit, my
>> best thought is to hijack the connection, which (I think) will prevent a
>> "100 Continue" status from being sent.  I'm concerned, however, that this
>> won't work in all cases - for example http2 connections are not hijackable (
>> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/15312).
>>
>> Is there a better path forward?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>> [1] https://code.google.com/p/google-compute-engine/issues/detail?id=298
>>   (also see "notes and restrictions" here:
>> https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/load-balancing/http/)
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to