Can you explain the rationale behind the classification of libraries as libraries or not libraries? It seems pretty arbitrary.
(I'm interested from a sociological perspective, but not enough to bother to go to the benchmarks game discussion forum). On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 15:08 -0700, 'Isaac Gouy' via golang-nuts wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 7:44:28 PM UTC-7, Jason E. Aten wrote: > > > > Observe that the java benchmark continues to be allowed to use an > > accelerated hash table library. > > > > "accelerated" ? > > By all means, post your reasons for *why that Java library should not be > used* in the benchmarks game discussion forum. > > Let's have pity on golang-nuts. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
