Hi, Go1.7 is faster in most benchmarks, but still slower than Java in some benchmarks(like Go 1.6). GO Garbage Collector needs time to become mature like JVM.
K-nucleotide, binary tree, Regex-dna are bad for GO(lack of fast GC and good standard libraries). But, for me, Go is an awesome substitute of Python and C++. Warm Regards, Asit http://asit-dhal.github.io On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 1:51:42 AM UTC+2, Eric Johnson wrote: > > Not that I think these account for much, but sort of fun to point at: > > https://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/go.html > (Short summary - now with Go 1.7, Go is faster for most benchmarks.) > > And then, for language adoption, the TIOBE language index for August of > 2016: > http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ > > (Note that the above is updated every six months, and I've not been able > to find a link to previous versions of the reports, however, you can look > for the trend for Go itself http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/go/ ). > Go finally breaks into the top twenty. > > As with any metrics, these are selective measures, and not really good > indicators by themselves. But at least they're positive with respect to Go. > > Eric. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
