On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 11:40:20 AM UTC+8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:17 PM, T L <tapi...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 9:06:00 AM UTC+8, mura wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Generally speaking, you may find it a bit of struggling if you are > trying > >> to write Go code in an attempt to emulate *how* other languages can do, > or > >> to argue with the compiler about how a fresh learner would come to > think in > >> the first place. A tip for making the learning/adaption process > smoother is > >> to focus on *what* you want to achieve in the problem domain (instead > of > >> language domain, like fighting the compiler). > >> > >> Veteran gophers would be most helpful if you ask about the specific > >> functionalities or features you are trying to build. It's very likely > that > >> the language problems you encountered don't exist at all in other > >> well-explored approaches. > >> > > > > And it is very appreciated if you can show the behind reason for "why > can't > > []Age be converted into []int". > > You have gotten several different answers to that question. > > What kind of answer would you find satisfactory? > > Ian >
No one have answered what is the behind reason for "why can't []Age be converted into []int" yet. I don't think "rules disallow it, so it can't" is a good answer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
