Aram, On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Aram Hăvărneanu <ara...@mgk.ro> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Seb Binet <seb.bi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > do you think it would be feasable to have a GOARCH=vm backend which would > > just be the portable "Ken's National 32000" ASM, have all the ssa > > optimizations from the gc toolchain, and have a vm interpret this? > > Everything is possible, it's just software. > > Some people thing everything is feasible too, that's the problem with > our industry; however, in this case what you describe is very > feasible. > > I have semi-concrete plans for such a port after I am done with > sparc64 and arm64 SSA. > would you mind sharing these semi-concrete plans? (perhaps on golang-dev?) I am obviously very interested in helping out. should we go through the official Go proposal process? -s PS: perhaps, instead of "vm" or "varch", the GOARCH should be named "dis" :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
