On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Tim Hockin <thoc...@google.com> wrote: >> Edit: It looks like this has more to do with being an interface >> method than an embedded type. >> >> https://play.golang.org/p/I5XPdWR_O0 > > Hmmm, you're right. It only happens for a value method.
Is this likely to change? I.e. can I hardcode "2" or should I actually write the loop to climb frames? Is there a limit to the number of frames I should inspect before I give up? Is the string "<autogenerated>" stable? >> Is there a generic way to get the caller safely, or should I just >> check for <autogenerated> and increment? > > I think that is what you should do here. > > Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
