Thanks for the explanation, The update I suggest is to add the following sentence to the end of the reflect.Value.IsNil documentation:
Likewise, if v was created by calling ValueOf on an initialised interface{} > value with a nil value pointer j, v.IsNil will return true, whereas j == > nil will return false. Based on the following observation: var m map[string]interface{} var i interface{} = m fmt.Printf("reflect.ValueOf(i).IsNil() == %t\n", reflect.ValueOf(i).IsNil()) fmt.Printf("i == nil == %t\n", i == nil) // output: // reflect.ValueOf(i).IsNil() == true // i == nil == false On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 14:43:41 UTC+1, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Sam Salisbury <samsal...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > All this gets me thinking, is there any use case where this fact is > useful? > > (I.e. a nil-valued interface not being equal to nil via the == > operator.) > > This has been discussed several times on the mailing list. An > interface value == nil if it is the zero value of the interface type. > It does not == nil if it holds the zero value of some other type, even > if the zero value of that other type is nil. Many people would be > surprised if > var v interface{} = 0 > fmt.Printf("%t\n", v == nil) > printed true. It should be equally surprising if > var v interface{} = (*byte)(nil) > fmt.Printf("%t\n", v == nil) > printed true. > > The confusion results because Go, perhaps unfortunately, uses the name > nil to designate both the zero value of an interface and the zero > value of a pointer (and a slice or map or channel too, for that > matter). If the names were different, this would be less confusing. > > > Also, should the reflect.Value.IsNil documentation be updated? It > doesn't > > mention this case where it differs*, only the one about it panicking on > a > > zero reflect.Value. > > > > * IsNil returns true for an interface{} with a nil value pointer, even > > though '== nil' return false. > > What update do you suggest? You say there is a "case where it > differs", but by my reading there is not. It may help to read > https://blog.golang.org/laws-of-reflection . > > Ian > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.