Why is converting it in a loop "neither clean nor efficient"? It seems to
be both to me: a) It's clean, as it's type-safe, so much less can go wrong
and it's obvious what it does and b) it's efficient, becaue a func([]T)
[]interface{} would need to use reflection, just to also have the same loop
(but a less efficient one, as every operation would need to reflect). So,
writing a loop would, in fact, be *more* efficient and clean than a
function.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:35 PM, T L <tapir....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Often, I need converting a []T to []interface{} to use the []interface as
> a variable length parameter.
> But converting a []T for []interface{} in a for loop is neither clean nor
> efficient.
>
> So is there a function in standard lib to convert []T to a []interface{}?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
