On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:54:02 +0000
Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If T{} is like 42, why “(&T{})" is legal?
>
> Because
>
> &T{...}
>
> is syntactic sugar for
>
> tmp := T{...} // behind the scenes
> &tmp
>
> and &tmp is an okay receiver in the OP.
But by the same logic one could state that
&42
should be allowed because behind the scenes it could have been
tmp := 42
&tmp
So, why this is not allowed for simple types?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
