What's funny is, I am taking this exact approach and going backwards. We 
had structured logging in the library I have and it is actually too much 
info for the end user that would be looking at it. This library is fairly 
decent in size.

On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 11:05:50 AM UTC-7, Peter Mogensen wrote:
>
> > So the standard log package is just the simplest thing possible. 
> > When you need something high-profile, simple ignore it and use the 
> > high-profile solution.   And the standard package indeed allows to 
> > "start small". 
>
> ... and it's my experience people often get stuck at "small" since it's 
> a non-trivial decision to replace all logging at once. 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to