Relaxing unformalized behavior makes little sense to me. Explaining why equality is inconsistent between slices and arrays is not something I want to do either.
On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 1:40:19 AM UTC-7, Chad wrote: > > Rob and Robert actually wrote that this area of the spec needs more work... > Otherwise, the behaviour of maps, slices and funcs cannot be fully > explained. > > On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 7:25:31 AM UTC+2, as....@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Go does not have reference types. As far as I know, the word was >> purposefully removed from the spec to remove the ambiguity surrounding the >> word. >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/golang-dev/926npffb6lA > > > > @Martin > > As I've mentioned earlier, one ought to be careful about false friends > from other languages. > I am not sure I understand what you mean by: > > if the name field is changed after the call > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
