torsdag 30. juni 2016 18.04.13 UTC+2 skrev charr...@gmail.com følgende: > > > > On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 3:42:51 PM UTC+2, Øyvind Teig wrote: >> >> The suggestions of generics discussed here and in the referenced >> documentation, will it be possible to compile the "Go-with-generics" >> language into some idiomatic Go and compile it with the standard compiler? >> (I guess *what* idiomatic means is the real question here..). Or would >> it break idiomatic Go? >> >> it can be done with using unsafe > ??
> > > >> If it won't break it, wouldn't it be better to add some of this instead >> of leaving some of these important matters out? (I have read a guy mention >> concurrency and Haskell; the language is so flexible that it may be added >> any way. And it has. So there is no standard way for it) >> >> Also, would it be possible to add generics around channels to (limit >> their functionality I assume (like not legal to address both sides of a >> channel in the same goroutine (I know it's sometimes nice)))? >> >> And make formal analysis (like transformation from Go-with-generics to >> CSPm) easier? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
