Nothing is stopping them, but people aren't going to go to the distribution docs for the Go standard library - they're going to go to the official docs.
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 9:13:18 PM UTC-7, as....@gmail.com wrote: > > If the distribution builders can take it out, what is preventing them from > adding their own documentation? > > On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 9:06:26 PM UTC-7, Joshua Chase wrote: >> >> Yep, that's exactly what I'm saying. >> >> >> https://lists.stg.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZLKQK7BOBVQVZ5B2ACQSXCOAOKLVRSTL/ >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038683 >> >> Supposedly patent/legal reasons? >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <ia...@golang.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:59 PM, <jcjosh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Should there be a note in the documentation that this has been removed >>> by >>> > the Fedora packagers? >>> > >>> > It would help assure developers that they're not insane when they get a >>> > compile error claiming that something that >>> > https://golang.org/pkg/crypto/elliptic says should be there, isn't >>> there. >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand: are you saying that Fedora removed >>> crypto/elliptic.P224 when they packaged the Go distribution? Why >>> would they do that? >>> >>> Ian >>> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
