On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18 AM, roger peppe <rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > No Go type should be assumed to be safe for concurrent use unless explicitly > documented otherwise (or obviously safe, for some definition of "obvious").
I think that's what I said? Either way it seems like there's no harm in being explicit. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
