Written by a International Centre Goa scholar-in-residence.

Peter Gordon  <https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/author/peter-gordon/>21
August 2021
<https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/opium-inc-how-a-global-drug-trade-funded-the-british-empire-by-thomas-manuel/>
  Non-Fiction
<https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/category/reviews/non-fiction-review/>
“Opium Inc.: How A Global Drug Trade Funded The British Empire” by Thomas
Manuel
[image: The Stacking Room: Opium Factory at Patna" (1851) (Wellcome
Collection)] *The Stacking Room: Opium Factory at Patna"* (1851) (Wellcome
Collection) <https://wellcomecollection.org/works/xt2gg8fp>

Opium’s role in the history of East Asia has been well-documented, most
notably perhaps in Julia Lovell’s definitive 2011 book *The Opium War*
<https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/archived-article/?articleID=1212>.
This, and others like it, deal with the issue mostly from the perspective
of the consuming countries, in particular China; Thomas Manuel’s *Opium
Inc.* is noteworthy in focusing just as much on the producer: India.

The outline of the story is well-known. Britain (then as now) was running a
large trade deficit with China: the British bought masses of tea, while the
Chinese were peculiarly uninterested in British products such as woolens.
But opium plugged the hole. Although China had some of its own opium,
Indian production was better and cheaper, and in what might otherwise have
been a textbook example of Ricardian competitive advantage at work, China
began importing so much opium that the trade balance turned the other way.
Chinese attempts to ban both opium and the trade ultimately led to the two
Opium Wars, the establishment of Hong Kong and what China has called “the
century of humiliation”.

The strength of Manuel’s book is that he includes a detailed description of
India’s part in this sorry saga: he sums it up as “the Chinese got opium,
the British got tea, and the Indians got colonialism.”


[image: Opium Inc.: How A Global Drug Trade Funded The British Empire,
Thomas Manuel (HaperCollins India, August 2021)]*Opium Inc.: How A Global
Drug Trade Funded The British Empire*, Thomas Manuel (HarperCollins India,
August 2021)

The British didn’t invent the international opium trade: that distinction,
says Manuel, goes to the Portuguese, but it took the Dutch to make it big
business:


Suddenly, in the late seventeenth century, the opium trade began to
flourish. Not to China but to the Dutch-controlled ports like Batavia
(currently Jakarta), Malacca and Manila in the Philippines… By the end of
the century, opium exports from Bengal were forty-three times higher than
they were at the beginning.



When the Dutch East India Company declined, and the East India Company took
over Bengal, the British took over the trade as well, claiming monopoly
rights on Bengali opium in 1773. The trade was initially restricted,
helpfully raising price in China, but:


In 1830, all attempts at restricting trade… were unceremoniously ended.
Between 1830 and 1839, the area under cultivation doubled in size. Opium
exports tripled…. By 1860, the area of opium cultivation had almost doubled
again. Then, in three years, by 1863, it had doubled again! So over the
century, the lands devoted to opium cultivation went up by almost 800 per
cent. There were eventually one million peasant households cultivating
opium on approximately half a million acres of land.



This drove the development of Indian bureaucracy, while the peasants were
trapped between landowners, moneylenders and brokers. “The lives of these
peasants were miserable,” writes Manuel.



This leads into what is Manuel’s main point, delineated in his subtitle:
“How A Global Drug Trade Funded The British Empire”. Opium not only saved
Britain’s trade balance, but also the finances of British India and hence
the Empire:


At its peak, opium was the third-highest source of revenue for the British
in India, after land and salt. This makes the Honourable East India Company
a drug cartel masquerading as a joint stock corporation masquerading as a
government. The British Raj in the nineteenth century was a narco-state – a
country sustained by trade in an illegal drug.



Manuel’s conclusion is perhaps overdrawn—opium was the third-highest source
of revenue, not the bulk of it—but the point is broadly true. Nor is he
wrong when he says that the legacies of this trade remain today, in India
as well as globally.

Again, it is in India where Manuel perhaps is most illuminating, at least
for readers who only know the East Asian side of this story. While his
description of the manufacturing process are Dickensian:


>From farms, it was sent to factories where it was tested, standardized and
packaged in chests of mango wood. These factories employed a small army of
children to crawl over ceiling-high scaffolding and painstakingly maintain
the precious drug till it was ready to be shipped…



the “business story” is fascinating in what it says about how trade,
business, economics and politics intertwined. The market was thrown open in
1830 because the East India Company had failed in enforcing its monopoly in
West India: so-called “Malwa opium” was proving a formidable competitor for
the Company’s own Bengal product:


It began to allow any merchant to export opium from Bombay as long as they
paid a transit duty. As paying the duty was cheaper than smuggling, the
smugglers made the savvy economic choice. As a result, Bombay exploded into
life.



Despite the baleful effects of opium on Indian society, Indians do not
always come off very well:


opium money became a vital source of income for the government in India.
This meant that the nationalist movement, as it gained purpose and
momentum, remained curiously silent on opium. In their pragmatism, they
didn’t want to risk winning the independence of an impoverished nation.



A book of this kind should be full of interesting titbits, and *Opium Inc.* has
its share. One is that opium traders would bank their silver receipts in
Canton and receive a document allowing them to cash out in London.


This method of moving money across the world before the banking system
really existed became the most efficient way to transfer fortunes back to
London from India. Soon, privateers who made fortunes in India would invest
in opium and use these documents as a way of transferring wealth back home
to England – regardless of how they made their fortune in the first place.



It’s obvious when you think about it.

Another, which one feels one ought to have known about, was the system of
loan guarantee insurance operated by the merchants in Canton:


This system came to be known as the ‘Canton Guaranty System’ and became the
inspiration for the first American bank deposit insurance statute, the
Safety Fund Act of 1829.





Manuel’s book can make curious reading for non-Indians. He finds it
necessary to explain that sherry is “a kind of wine that has been fortified
with extra spirit for potency” and when describing opium’s origins, he
notes that


The Minoans are one of the earliest civilizations in the European sphere,
overlapping for centuries with the Indus Valley civilization thousands of
kilometres away…



inverting the way such a comparison would “normally” go. These are healthy
reminders that even the most objective study is ever grounded in certain
cultural and historical points of view.

The book unfortunately contains more errors than it should. He writes, for
example, of opium clippers “with the power of steam” in the 1820s, and how,
during the Opium War of 1840s, one clipper “was deployed to carry mail for
the British from India through the Suez Canal” which didn’t open until
1869. He has the “British Community in Hong Kong” during the First Opium
War, and Russia denied trading rights in Canton because it had a separate
treaty-designated “port” (it was a border post). These are for most part
not very serious, but someone should have caught them.

*Opium Inc. *is a good, readable book, and a salutary Indian take on a
subject that is mostly written solely with a China-Britain focus. More
editing could have made it a very good book.
------------------------------
Peter Gordon is editor of the Asian Review of Books.
https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/opium-inc-how-a-global-drug-trade-funded-the-british-empire-by-thomas-manuel/

-- 

FN * +91-9822122436 * 784 Saligao 403511 Bardez Goa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Goa-Research-Net" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/CAMCR53L4Eb%2BpXetGEf6S2A0EpY8ThQ4c3YBrHWV3iquqFVFeJA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to