On 10/10/24 10:09, Björn Persson wrote:
Mike Schleif wrote:
[...]
encryption error:
gpg: 9B51B2A5C71BDCEC: There is no assurance this key belongs to the named
user
Such assurance is provided by signing the key. Maybe the signatures
have been lost somehow, or the key that signed all the other keys is
missing or untrusted, or you never signed the keys in the first place.
Use --list-sigs to see what signatures exist. Then use --check-sigs to
see whether the signatures are valid.
The thought occurs to me: we already know that this user has a bunch of
PGP2 keys in their keyring. Could the local signatures intended to
validate trust on other keys have been from now-unusable PGP2 keys?
-- Jacob
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
