On 17 Apr 2024, at 15:43, Christian Sommer <code.soma.kur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You are right Andrew! > > I indeed choose to preset the "with-fingerprint" option in my > gpg.conf. By removing it, listing my keys give back the full 64 > character long fingerprint of my X448 key.
Good to hear! I think the best solution is for gnupg to ignore the `with-fingerprint` configuration option. Modern versions display primary key fingerprints by default anyway, so the alternative display format is both redundant and potentially confusing. I would be particularly concerned that people with different settings in their gpg.conf would see a mismatch between the 50-character fingerprint on one machine and the 64-character fingerprint on another, and incorrectly infer that something shady was going on. Differences in whitespace formatting are broadly expected (ref: credit card numbers) but truncation is not. And to pick up on an earlier point, short key IDs should never be displayed or processed under any circumstances. Evil32 was a whole decade ago. A
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
