Am 03.12.21 um 12:04 schrieb Bernhard Reiter: > Hi Peter, > > Am Donnerstag 02 Dezember 2021 17:35:17 schrieb Dr. Peter Voigt: >> thanks for that page. I'm not using Thunderbird but I know many people >> who do. In particular the option to turn off the annoying dots is very >> useful. > > good to know that you think it is useful. :) No doubt it is useful. This three-dot-BS by default looks more like a bug than a meaningful feature, IMO.
> >> Did you toot the link through Mastodon as well >> - I just failed to find and re-toot a correspondig content. > > I didn't toot it so far. > > First I wanted to gather some feedback, especially about the following > section, where I've added a recommendation what to use instead > of incompatible header encryption: > > > | Transport information in a decentral network - just like the writing on the > | outside of a postal mail envelope - cannot be protected in principle. > | When reflecting on this, chose a subject that is plausible in context, > | but without sensitive contents, to best veil potential unwanted observers. > | (Your thinking is right: The more sensitive this is, the more you have > | to build up a plausible context for your unavoidable traces first.) > This caters more to spies or people who have to be paranoid for an other reason. And they will know already. The average user, I guess, just wants to keep private communication private. And what the subject reveals should in most cases be negligible. So to me this paragraph seems a bit out of place. > (Also I've just improved the phrasing and spelling.) > > Best Regards, > Bernhard Thanks for your time and effort! Rainer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
