Am Sa den 6. Mär 2021 um 16:32 schrieb Klaus Ethgen: > [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774468
Sadly, Gentoo closed that bug as invalid as they do not have pam_gnupg in their software stack and so they say, that it is a usecase that is not supportet by them. It is a bit short thought. Their pinentry has a bug, that is triggered this way and they don't care. Regards Klaus -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <kl...@ethgen.ch> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
