Am Sa den  6. Mär 2021 um 16:32 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
> [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774468

Sadly, Gentoo closed that bug as invalid as they do not have pam_gnupg
in their software stack and so they say, that it is a usecase that is
not supportet by them.

It is a bit short thought. Their pinentry has a bug, that is triggered
this way and they don't care.

Regards
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen                                       http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16            Klaus Ethgen <kl...@ethgen.ch>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to