On 22/01/2021 17:29, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users wrote: > this is a non-backward-compatible change to the format, so i think > that's probably not a great outcome.
I can't help thinking that length fingerprinting and padding oracles are a general concern, and therefore more appropriately solved at a lower layer of the network stack. A
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
