On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:27:24PM +0100, Stefan wrote in
<CAC6FiZ4uHas_Qz3UC-ixfe3hhGeBj5isp6OZ5Yvs=rrwlvm...@mail.gmail.com>:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:16 PM Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users
<gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
Hi Juergen.
Your showcase with github.io also says nothing else than that Sequoia
considers an invalid certificate to be correct. That this happens in
audited software says just as much about the value of the audit.
Please try to accept that GitHub's SSL cert is *valid*, or do you think
that a CA certifies and invalid cert?
It is not valid for the requested sub-sub-domain. Just as if you would hold my
passport, the passport itself might be valid, but it is not valid for you to
identify yourself with.
That said, welcome to my kill file.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
