-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 01:47, Ángel said:
I understand this to mean it as "only use the direct method if the
required sub-domain does not exist", with the SHOULD meaning that the
direct method is not required (not sure why, I would have probably used
Right. The subdomain is actually a workaround for SRV RR. We can't
use the latter in browser based implementation and thus need to resort
to this hack.
Forgive my ignorance, but can someone explain, what "browser based
implementation" of WKD exists (or might exist) and/or why this is
desirable?
Shouldn't the WKD draft rather give the WKD implementation the
responsibility to use a proper dns client library? I assume other
protocols (which allow SRV records to redirect requests) do this (xmpp,
irc, ...)?
regards, Erich
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xq9S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
