Stefan Claas wrote: > ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > > > > > > > On 8/11/2020 at 3:00 PM, "Stefan Claas" <s...@300baud.de> wrote: > > > > ... > > > > >As understood a Pegasus operator can do what ever > > >he likes to do remotely, anonymously with our (Android/iOS) > > >smartphone, without that we know that this happens. > > > > ... > > > > >in form of a best practice FAQ (cross-platform), to no longer use > > >encryption software on online devices and work out > > >strategies to use offline devices and how to handle this data > > >securely over to an online device, until proper and affordable > > >hardware encryption devices for online usage are available? > > > > ===== > > > > There is already a simple existing solution. > > > > [1] Encrypt and decrypt on a computer that has internet hardware disabled. > > I am thinking about this mobile one, once it hits the market. > > https://pocket.popcorncomputer.com/#products > > > [2] Use an Orbic Journey V phone that gets and sends *only text* > > Seems not to be available in Germany, so I must look for a similar one.
Thinking about another option smart phone users can try (I currently have no second smart phone). Since I am new to smart phone usage, I figured out that one can use a second smart phone without a SIM-Card and with WiFi disabled. :-) This means to me, regardless if people would use Android with Termux and GnuPG or a Linux smart phone that they simply create the messages on the IMHO not (so easy?!) compromisable second offline smart phone and then transfer securely the encrypted messages to the compromised online usage smart phone. Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
