On Mon, 18 May 2020 12:16, Robert J. Hansen said: > Centralized key management schemes are sometimes very useful.
I fully agree and I personally known that this is a common use case. However, people requiring such a use case do not talk in the public about their specific infrastructure and are also not affected by the alleged privacy enhancements needs people are talking about. The nice thing with OpenPGP is that you can implement any kind of PKI with it and you are not as restricted as with X.509/PKIX. And it is just one RFC and not several dozens RFCs and other documents you all need to read, analyze, and guess like we see the PKIX world. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
