I think we are conflating two related but distinct ideas here. On 15/05/2020 13:35, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Why do you want to be able to import a key in > GnuPG that would be utterly unusable?
There are use cases where you might want to transfer only the modifications to a key, without necessarily distributing the entire key. Publicly revoking a primary key without disclosing its user IDs, for example. But this is distinct from being able to create a new key with no user IDs at all, which I see no reasonable use for - if your user ID is sensitive, then use an alias. Even in the use case described above the keys have aliases. -- Andrew Gallagher
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
