> Thus the current wording is sufficient and has served us well over the last 25 > years
If your statement here includes the "by convention contains an rfc2822 name-addr" part of the wording, please bring this opinion up on the openpgp-wg thread. The argument is being made (and I agree) that it's plain to see that implementations neither emit user ids as rfc2822, nor parse them as such, by convention or otherwise. The spec is factually wrong and misleading for implementors in this aspect, and should be updated to reflect reality. - V _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
