> This list will be long. Yes. And frankly, it's a bigger subject than just GnuPG: to be effective we'd need to get buy-in from OpenPGP.js and Sequoia, for starters.
Optimistically, we'd be looking at two years of work, maybe more. One of the things I'm beginning to consider, though, is that it might be a good idea to make the Implementation-Future group invitation-only. Over the last few years I have *really* lost faith in the idea of open and unmoderated groups. The gist I posted where I outlined the poisoned-certificates attack took all of three messages before someone started accusing me of being a bigot on account of my belief that child pornography is a moral evil... https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f#gistcomment-2957390 _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
