On Wed, 22 May 2019 00:21, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said: > work without requring removal/re-insertion of the card, but presumably > such a change has security implications or the original developers > would not have used PCSC_SHARE_EXCLUSIVE. So... I don't know if such a > change is advisable. Any feedback on that? I'm thinking that it may
Don't. We are currently working on autoswitching between different applications on the card and thus a controlling instance is required. A second daemon (ie. using a second GNUPGHOME) on the same reader is thus not a good idea. FWIW, scdameon handles several readers just fine. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
