Hi Robert. On 20/05/2018 02:26, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Writing just for myself -- not for GnuPG and not for Enigmail and > definitely not for my employer -- I put together a postmortem on Efail. > You may find it worth reading. You may also not. Your mileage will > probably vary. :) > > https://medium.com/@cipherpunk/efail-a-postmortem-4bef2cea4c08
As a long time reader and partly gpg user I would like to thank you for the post. >From my point of view must be something more behind the curtain. I do not want to create a conspiracy theory but it's wiggy that EFF favors *NO* security ,pgp or s/mime, instead to fix the current possibilities and promote signal. As serveral people mentioned in the different Internet medias is signal not a replaceable for e-mail, until the signal company does not offer a own e-mail service. That's just my gut instincts the future will share some lights into this EFAIL scandal. jm2c Best regards Aleks _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
