> Am 17.05.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org>: > > On Thu, 17 May 2018 08:59, patr...@enigmail.net said: > >> Within 12 hours after the release I got 5 bug reports/support requests > > Kudos to Enigmail for acting as our guinea pig. I implemented the same > thing in GPGME this morning (see my mail to enigmail users).
During the implementation of our MDC fix, we came across two STATUS messages which are not documented in doc/DETAILS which are: - GOODMDC - BADMDC Is there any particular reason why these have not been added to doc/DETAILS? If we check for DECRYPTION_INFO 0 X (0 being NO MDC) and the BADMDC status line (in addition to DECRYPTION_FAILED), can we safely assume that all known cases of no MDC or modified MDC are covered (even for CAST5, which at the moment issues DECRYPTION_OKAY)? Best, Lukas GPGTools
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
