On Apr 12, 2018 2:30 AM, FuzzyDrawrings via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > > Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > the first word is `99' which in binary would be > > `10011001'. I was expecting to encounter `11000110'. > > You were expecting the packet header to be written in the "new" format, but > it is actually written in the "old" format (indicated by it beginning with > "10" vs "11"). See RFC-4880 section 4.2.
This is what I thought I was seeing, but thought I read somewhere that gpg creates version 4 packets. Thanks. > > Public key packets have a Tag ID of 6, and the "new" format isn't required > unless the packet has a Tag ID greater than 15. > > -fuzzy > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
