On 15/03/18 17:03, Phil Susi wrote: > Windows has this feature built in already, why not just use that?
I'm not a Windows user, I mentioned that I'm a Linux desktop user in my original post. -- On 15/03/18 17:11, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > The obvious approach would be to write a FUSE driver Yeah this would be a cool approach that'd mean less reliance on the kernel. However the files we (me and my colleagues) access (although they're all using Windows PCs) are on SMB/Windows shares... so somehow the overlay would have to work with that. -- On 15/03/18 17:11, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > I saw a commercial product here that might do what you want I'll take a closer look thanks... although on first glance I can't see anything about SMB/Windows share support (for remote files it just mentions SSH). -- On 15/03/18 22:39, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > you could look into ext4's native encryption features and... On 16/03/18 00:58, gn...@raf.org wrote: > luks full disk encryption would be best Yeah I just use LUKS on my PC to protect local files, but this is (as above) for files on SMB/Windows shares... sorry for not mentioning that sooner. -- Any other ideas welcome :) To be honest I was kind of hoping someone would pop up an say there was a PGP-compatible open source alternative kernel module that did the same thing! Perhaps this was something the PGP guys kept closed source and Symantec have continued to keep it that way since they bought them out? -- Steven Maddox Lantizia _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
