2018-02-21 20:56 GMT+09:00 Kristian Fiskerstrand <kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com>: > On 02/21/2018 11:53 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > Touché :) Indeed, didn't notice it was an old file/signature , then > gnupg 1.4 is the recommended official suggestion presuming established > validity of key material etc etc.
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.22 does give more information, but no success; see below. May I assume that nothing can be done other than to request the author to remedy the situation? Thanks all. Henry result of using gnupg 1.4: % gpg1 --import D5327CB9.key gpg: key D5327CB9: "author <aut...@xxx.org>" not changed gpg: Note: signatures using the MD5 algorithm are rejected gpg: key D5327CB9: no valid user IDs gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature gpg: Total number processed: 2 gpg: w/o user IDs: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 % gpg1 --verify ***6.4.tar.gz.sig ***6.4.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Tue May 4 23:03:11 2004 JST using RSA key ID D5327CB9 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
